Jesus as Torah – Love Wins

While I await my copy of Rob Bell’s new book Love Wins: A Book about Heaven, Hell and the Fate of Every Person Who Ever Lived to arrive later this week, I have been reading some of the blog posts and news articles about the book as well as engaging in a few discussions with other people concerning what Rob Bell’s views potentially are. I have also spent some time ruminating about how I feel about the topic of God’s love as it relates to Heaven and Hell.

Those who have read through my still unfinished series on Hell have no doubt picked up on the fact that I am highly doubtful of the existence of an eternal type of Hell where those who ultimately reject God will end up being eternally punished for a lifetime of sinful living. While I am not a Universalist and I do believe that salvation is through Christ alone, I am leaning toward more of an inclusivist theology. I would like to believe that my God is big enough to make a way to whatever afterlife there is, still through Christ, for those who may call upon Him in whatever context that they have been raised in, whether that be Allah or even the Great Spirit. With that said, I am still not excused from spreading the words of Christ whenever and wherever I can.

I am beginning to wonder if we as Christians are asking all of the wrong questions when it comes to Heaven and Hell. Many people claim that Jesus spoke more about Hell than anyone else in the Bible, and although I will admit that He did speak much about Judgment, I am beginning to realize that many of those “Hell passages” were more than likely speaking about “Hell on earth” than they were about Hell in the afterlife. I think that at least half of those passages where directly pointed at the judgment that was to befall Jerusalem in 70 CE. And even those passages where He was definitely speaking about the Final Judgment, I believe that from an epistemological standpoint it is impossible to determine what the fate of those who receive a “negative judgment” might end up being. I lean towards annihilationism but I have not ruled out rehabilitation for those who are willing…perhaps a purgatorial type of Hell much like Origen wrote about.

The overwhelming message that I find in the Gospels is that of love and grace, not one of judgment. A couple of passages come to mind here. The first is John 3:17 where Jesus states that “”God did not send His Son into the world to judge the world, but that the world might be saved through Him”. This is echoed later on in John 12:47 where Jesus states that ” If anyone hears my words and does not keep them, I do not judge him; for I did not come to judge the world but to save the world.” When I read the Gospels, what I see is love, love, love, and grace, grace, grace.

“Okay”, you might say, “but what does that have to do with the Torah?”

I have read quite a few books and essays that essentially say that Jesus came into the world as Torah, hence His words, “I came not to destroy the law (Torah), but to fulfill the law.” If you read through the the first eighteen verses of John and substitute “Torah” for “Word” you can make some startling conclusions.

With “Jesus as Torah” in mind we might read the beginning of John as ; “In the beginning was the Torah, and the Torah was with God, and the Torah was God.” or “In the beginning was the Law, and the Law as with God, and the Law was God.” Again, of course, we need to read the entire chapter, especially those all-important verses: “And the Torah became flesh, and dwelt among us,” and the equivalency of Jesus as this Word, this Law; the equivalency of Jesus and God.

An interesting thing that I have discovered during my study on Hell was how ancient Israel related to the afterlife. It appears that they were not all that concerned about what happened after they died. Not that it was never thought about the afterlife, it’s just that by and large Israel focused on Torah. Later in their history, during and after the exile, there was more focus on the afterlife, but Torah was still primarily about the here and now. Torah was not so much just a bunch of rules, but a means by which one lived a life dedicated to God. Torah also created a means by which an observant Jew could be in relationship with Yahweh, and a right relationship with God meant that God’s Shekinah glory would dwell (or tabernacle) in the temple and be accessible for remission of sins much like Jesus now tabernacles among us and is available to all who call upon His name. Torah was primarily meant for this life, not the next one. The blessings that one received by being a Torah-observant Jew were to be received in this life, not the next one. “Love the Lord your God with all of your heart and your neighbor as yourself” was a way of bringing immediate blessings to you and all of those around you.

So, if Torah was primarily meant for this life, and Jesus is Torah, then perhaps living a life for Jesus should not be so focused on the next life, but more so for right now. Jesus is the same yesterday, today and forever, and if Torah was meant primarily for this life, then what changed after Christ fulfilled Torah and essentially became Torah? If God really intended us to focus on loving Him and doing as much for His Son as possible in this life, then why are we so concerned about the next one? The next one will come soon enough…perhaps too soon for many of us.

Maybe we are spending too much time worrying about “who’s in” and who’s out” and missing out on spreading the Gospel that Jesus preached. It was a Gospel that essentially meant that “Love Wins” as the title of Bell’s book suggests. And instead of waiting for Heaven or worrying about Hell, maybe we should be spending that time getting to know Jesus a little better and asking ourselves what He was really saying about His Kingdom , one that I believe was inaugurated on Easter morning when he overcame the world, ripped the temple veil and made God’s Shekinah glory available to every man and woman who would ever live.

While I do believe that we will all stand at the Judgment Seat of Christ one day, perhaps all of the focus on Heaven, Hell (and when Christ is returning) takes our eyes off of what Jesus wants for us to be doing in the here and now, which is spreading His love and His message wherever and whenever possible. Sure, I look forward to Heaven, and there are scores of New Testament verses that repeatedly underscore the hope that we have for resurrection bodies living forever with God in a New Heaven and a New Earth. However, the only time or place that we have any control over is here and now.

With the recent devastation in Japan following the earthquake and tsunami, I am reminded of just how fragile our lives are. Any one of us can be gone in an instant. Perhaps a more concentrated focus on what I can be doing right now for Jesus is much more important that anything else. And I think that sharing the love of Jesus is much more appealing and Biblically correct than warning everyone about burning in Hell. A Hell that we can’t even prove exists (at least not in the traditional Jonathan Edwards sense) to begin with.

I don’t know what I will find in Rob Bell’s book, but I doubt that it will be anything that I will strongly disagree with. I doubt that he is a universalist (although he might have some inclusivist leanings) and I doubt that he is going to chunk Hell out of the Bible altogether. I kind of suspect that he is going to be saying something of the sort of what I’m thinking here in this post. “Stop worrying so much about Heaven and Hell and get busy for Christ, for the Kingdom of God is among us right now.” Whatever he has to say, I will be writing a review on his book in a couple of weeks (fingers crossed).

Note: I will be resuming my series on Hell in a few weeks. Right now I am tied up with other projects and simply don’t have the time.

Eternal Life – A Gift or A Given?

In a discussion about the nature of Hell, a topic which must be considered is the immortality or the soul. If the human soul is inherently immortal, then only two possibilities exist; either one must embrace some sort of Universalism in which God will ultimately heal and redeem every person who has ever existed, including figures such as Adolf Hitler and Ted Bundy, or one must admit that there are simply some individuals who are irredeemable and must therefore be banished from the presence of God, which necessitates some form Hell which includes eternal conscious torment.

Many other world religions such as Buddhism and Hinduism explicitly have beliefs centered around an eternal soul. In the Western world, Plato was one of the first to positivity state that the human soul was indeed immortal and he was drawing from Aristotle when he wrote that the soul was pre-existent as well as eternal. Many Christians who deny the immortality of the soul will claim that it was because of the influence of Greek philosophy that many early Christian thinkers adopted doctrines centered around inherit immortality which included forms of Universalism as well as eternal conscious torment. I think that the pre-existence of the soul like the Mormons teach can be easily ruled out as early as Genesis 2:7, but as to whether or not the life that God breathes into us is then eternal requires a bit more looking at.

The Biblical witness on this topic is subject to many differences of opinion. Frankly, from my reading of the Bible, eternal life seems to be a gift that God may grant to those who are in Him, but is not an inherit attribute of the human soul. Beginning in the earliest portions of Genesis, we see how Adam and Eve are driven out of the Garden of Eden lest they “take from the Tree of Life and live forever” (Genesis 3:22). This theme of eternal life being a gift granted or denied carries through the books of the Bible all the way to the end of Revelation where those thrown into the Lake of Fire are deemed to have undergone the “second death” (Revelation 20:14-15). In the middle of all of this we have Jesus clearly stating that God can indeed ‘destroy both body and soul in Gehenna” in Matthew 10:28.

When the Rich Young Ruler asks Jesus what he must do to “inherit eternal life” in Mark 10:17, Jesus does not tell him “Oh, you already have eternal life, what you need to worry about is Hell Fire”, but instead instructs him on what is needed to enter the Kingdom of God. Even the well-worn John 3:16 indicates that eternal life is what is at stake in believing in Jesus and that the alternative is to simply perish. Why does Jesus, in the vast bulk of His teachings,  tell us that eternal life is what is at stake instead of Heaven and Hell? He does warn about Hell of course, but the nature and duration of Hell can be debated, as we have seen so far.

Paul too, never seems to assume that immortality is a given. In 1 Corinthians 15:54 Paul writes about a time where “this mortal will put on immortality” and writes to Timothy that God is “the only One who has immortality” (1 Tim. 6:15-16). Another interesting passage is Romans 2:6-8 which is reminiscent of Daniel 12:2-3.

“He will repay each one according to his works :  eternal life  to those who by patiently doing good  seek for glory, honor, and immortality;  but wrath and indignation to those who are self-seeking and disobey the truth, but are obeying unrighteousness;”

Just like in Daniel, Paul states that the righteous will inherit eternal life and the wicked wrath and indignation. But notice that in neither of these passages does it explicitly state that the wicked will experience God’s wrath in a state of conciousness. At least in these passages it could be easily said that the wicked will not inherit eternal life or anything like it. And eternal indignation or contempt could easily mean the contempt of the memory of those who have long ago been destroyed in the Lake of Fire.

Of course, there are a small handful of passages which might seem to indicate eternity for the wicked, such as Matthew 25:46. I am going to look at these passages in another post sometime next week, as there are some keywords that need to be examined to determine whether eternal damnation was really in mind here.

When the overall biblical witness appears to state that eternal life is a gift, should we not approach those very few scriptures that seem to indicate otherwise in an attempt to see if we’re reading them incorrectly? I do not buy into those who state that the righteousness of God necessitates eternal punishment for the wicked. I can’t find sound reasoning or exegesis in that hypothesis at all.  As I wrote a couple of days ago, I believe that God’s benevolence completely rules that out.

And if we’re talking about the doctrine of Conditional Mortality, I do not believe that adopting that stance necessitates Soul Sleep as many advocates of Conditional Mortality posit. In fact, although I think that conditional mortality screams from the scriptures, I do not think that soul sleep does. If anything, soul sleep whispers from the pages of the Bible, and I think that it is highly unlikely  and requires the dispensing of and twisting of a large number of passages that indicate otherwise.

As I am not prone to Universalism (even though I would like to be pleasantly surprised), I would have to accept that there is indeed some sort of eternal “hell” of some sort in wait for those irredeemables if indeed it could be proven that the soul is inherently immortal. However, I think that the witness of scripture seems to indicate otherwise; that eternal life is a gift to be granted at the Judgment Seat of Christ.

Questioning Hell Main Page